From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 26 15:19:12 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B67106567B
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:19:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net)
Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net
	[66.230.99.27])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB39513C45E
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:19:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4C71CDD1;
	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:19:10 -0900 (AKST)
From: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:19:08 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7
References: <006601c87871$186e79b0$3202a8c0@glattwerk.local>
	<47C42561.5000005@locolomo.org>
	<200802261549.39342.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
In-Reply-To: <200802261549.39342.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200802261619.09179.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?M=E4chler_Philippe?= <pmaechler@glattnet.ch>
Subject: Re: ARP Messages
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:19:12 -0000

On Tuesday 26 February 2008 15:49:38 Mel wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008 15:42:41 Erik Norgaard wrote:
> > Mel wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 26 February 2008 13:14:11 M=E4chler Philippe wrote:
> > >> %netstat -rn
> > >> Routing tables
> > >>
> > >> Internet:
> > >> Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use
> > >> Netif Expire
> > >>
> > >> 192.168.2          192.168.3.254      UGS         0     8209
> > >> bge1
> > >> 192.168.3          link#2             UC          0        0
> > >> bge1
> > >
> > > These routes look fishy. It shouldn't have a route for 192.168.2 cause
> > > it's nowhere defined, so it should go through default, not through
> > > bge1. Any chance a machine on your network has 192.168.2/24 and
> > > publishing it, where it should be 80.242 something?
> > > Try route delete 192.168.2.0 and see if it clears.
> >
> > This part is ok if you see the schema in OPs later mail.
>
> Really? Where do you see 192.168.TWO instead of 192.168.THREE?

Never mind, I see it now in the wrapped part :/
Anything on that switch that uses 80.242? specifically a machine with mac=20
00:19:bb:25:7b:63 and ip 80.242.192.81?
Where is that mac address in your schema?

=2D-=20
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
    and never get to the software part.