Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:30:54 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> To: karels@karels.net Cc: Stephen.Clark@seclark.us, Sten Daniel Soersdal <netslists@gmail.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2 mtu now limits size of incomming packet Message-ID: <4698355E.2030707@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200707140106.l6E16HWi006607@redrock.karels.net> References: <200707140106.l6E16HWi006607@redrock.karels.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Karels wrote: > I'd be happy to see the change undone as well. I (well, our test > group) found this change in a similar way, and it didn't agree with > our previous usage. > In -CURRENT my changes to the ethernet input path maintain the use of ETHER_MAX_FRAME() however the check is folded under #ifdef DIAGNOSTIC. I don't recall adding this conditional or touching it so it seems to be something which was already thereo radded by someone else. Could be pilot error; its use in -CURRENT seems to apply strictly to the use of large-receive offload (LRO). regards, BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4698355E.2030707>