From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 05:46:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E307C16A4CE for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:46:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8AD43D36 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 05:46:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from p65-147.acedsl.com (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBCDk4K9000952 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:46:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:49:05 -0500 (EST) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: FreeBSD Chat List Message-ID: <20031212084643.F10569@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: CF cards wear out? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 13:46:06 -0000 Not related directly to FreeBSD so figure chat would be more appropriate. Recently I got recommendations on this list the Soekris machines and M0n0wall for a firewall. On the M0n0Wall archives I found the following: >nothing is written to the CF card (it is usually mounted read-only), to >minimize the chance of wearing it out. Do CF cards "wear out"? Aren't they like memory?