From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  6 02:34:27 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FBB37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 May 2003 02:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns3.safety.net (ns3.safety.net [216.40.201.32])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C8043F3F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 May 2003 02:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from cbiffle@safety.net)
Received: from localhost (rs.rackshack.net.safety.net [216.40.201.32])
	by ns3.safety.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h469YPA18264;
	Tue, 6 May 2003 02:34:25 -0700
From: "Cliff L. Biffle" <cbiffle@safety.net>
To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 02:34:56 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <52729.1052213366@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <52729.1052213366@critter.freebsd.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200305060234.56528.cbiffle@safety.net>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gbde failure attaching /dev/fd0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 09:34:27 -0000

On Tuesday 06 May 2003 02:29 am, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >I suspected something along these lines.  No worries.  The Zip drive I
> > look forward to, but the floppies are basically a corner case.
>
> Yeah, well, they are actually some of the media that could benefit most
> from gbde...

Certainly -- I have to remind myself that people do still store data on 
floppies.
For me, floppies do an excellent job of encrypting my data all by themselves.  
However, I have yet to figure out the decryption algorithm.

I used the Zip drive's password features a lot under Windows/MacOS, so my 
personal evil plan was to start GBDE-ing my Zip disks. :-)

-Cliff L. Biffle