From owner-freebsd-security Wed Apr 19 18:43:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mail-04-real.cdsnet.net (mail-04-real.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00B2937BD8A for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 18:43:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mrcpu@internetcds.com) Received: (qmail 11158 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2000 01:43:08 -0000 Received: from schizo.cdsnet.net (204.118.244.32) by mail-03-real.cdsnet.net with SMTP; 20 Apr 2000 01:43:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 18:38:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Jaye Mathisen X-Sender: mrcpu@schizo.cdsnet.net To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , Robert Watson , "Michael S. Fischer" , security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fw: Re: imapd4r1 v12.264 (fwd) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, it all depends on what you're looking for. If you use maildir format for NFS mailbox storage via qmail/procmail/whathave you, then courier-imap in ports is a slick IMAP server for it that works like a champ. I don't think it's necessarily FreeBSD's responsibility to "grade" ports, if somebody went to the work of submitting it, and it's not a "trivial" program, then we should stuff it in there. On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > > Let me second that opinion. I'd prefer just dropping it from ports > > collection. > > The problem is the lack of an alternative IMAP server in ports. There's > cyrus, but apparently that is slightly intrusive to install. > > Kris > > ---- > In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. > -- Charles Forsythe > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message