From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  7 22:24:47 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA09544
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 22:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA09538
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 22:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA10424; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 22:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
cc: davidg@Root.COM, hackers@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD Hackers)
Subject: Re: The -stable problem: my view 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 07 Jun 1996 22:19:19 MDT."
             <199606080419.WAA02553@rocky.sri.MT.net> 
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 1996 22:24:27 -0700
Message-ID: <10422.834211467@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Do you have any suggestions?  Would creating a new 'stable' tree today
> be even remotely acceptable?

You mean as a solution, or are you speaking more generally?

					Jordan