Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:19:42 +0200 From: "Reko Turja" <reko.turja@liukuma.net> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, "Matthias Fechner" <idefix@fechner.net> Subject: Re: Poudriere building far more ports than it should Message-ID: <00108188ED664AAC8BD6F2B64C8AB3D8@RIVENDELL> In-Reply-To: <de345be1-b81f-ecd7-1f02-eff87b5cec2f@fechner.net> References: <7B44FD5ED75B4BCB8E53B611BE045D11@RIVENDELL> <20181114175544.GA3692@wstan> <6A6585E03E754B0B860F64D2A5AA160E@RIVENDELL> <de345be1-b81f-ecd7-1f02-eff87b5cec2f@fechner.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----Original Message----- From: Matthias Fechner Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:10 PM Am 14.11.2018 um 19:57 schrieb Reko Turja via freebsd-ports: >> I guess one option would be blacklisting in poudriere those unneeded >> dependencies which shouldn't be linked with my packages, if my options >> are honoured by poudriere. > > have you made your options (maybe they are located on /var/db/ports) > available to poudriere? < (normally poudriere searches them in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/options) Yes I have andd after noticing the huge increase in ports to be build, doublechecked that my options had really transferred over using poudriere options -c -j <my jail> -f <my portlist> instead of -C... -Reko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00108188ED664AAC8BD6F2B64C8AB3D8>