From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Apr 10 14:17:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA01076 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA01071 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 14:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA09688; Thu, 10 Apr 1997 13:54:32 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199704102054.NAA09688@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: on the subject of changes to -RELEASEs... To: spaz@u.washington.edu (John Utz) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 13:54:32 -0700 (MST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, proff@suburbia.net, nate@mt.sri.com, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, terry@lambert.org, sef@kithrup.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "John Utz" at Apr 10, 97 12:50:08 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [ ... moving crap out of multiple config files on a writable root ... ] > i think the idea has merit, but gets into the "we are BSD, dammit" > argument. i dont have an opinion one way or the other, other than to point > out that some day there will be more linux and *BSD administrators than > "cost money unix" administrators, so this argument about existing > implementation similarity will become moot. #undef CSRG Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.