From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Sat Jul  4 17:38:33 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FF29B5F
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat,  4 Jul 2015 17:38:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com)
Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C6F1870
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Jul 2015 17:38:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com)
Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net
 [173.48.121.235])
 by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A40113F734
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Jul 2015 13:38:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <55981A11.8090300@sneakertech.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 13:38:25 -0400
From: Quartz <quartz@sneakertech.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Best console hardware monitor pkg?
References: <559760A3.7000901@sneakertech.com>
 <20150704150742.cd7c045a.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <20150704092041.03767068@seibercom.net> <5597F233.7090201@sneakertech.com>
 <20150704170548.fc12bd39.freebsd@edvax.de>
 <20150704161736.7025b3e187c9efbe119b1cc6@sohara.org>
 <5597FACB.3050506@sneakertech.com> <5597FBCD.2060001@hiwaay.net>
 <55980239.9010601@sneakertech.com> <20150704180726.b46748f7.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <20150704180726.b46748f7.freebsd@edvax.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2015 17:38:33 -0000

> It would probably have made more sense to call the combined
> package simply mbmon, with a "make configure" step if you
> wanted it with X support - which means that the list of
> runtime dependencies would grow. The "x" in "xmobon" package
> naming therefore is a bit confusing, as it refers to the
> option of X support, not a default X support...

Hmm.... ok, well I guess as long as it's deliberate it's probably ok.


> To expand a bit, mbmon & healthd seem to agree on (chipset ?) temp, as
> distinct from amdtemp. However both only report for 2 CPU's (cores ?),
> while amdtemp reports (wrongly, IMHO) for all 4 (in my case) .... If
> healthd &/or mbmon would report (accurately) for all 4 cores, I'd love
> them more :-) ....

Maybe mbmon and healthd are confused about hyperthreading and think you 
only have two real cores? That's the only thing I can think of.