From owner-freebsd-security Fri Nov 30 12:39: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from tomts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts7.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A7737B417; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 12:39:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from khan.anarcat.dyndns.org ([65.94.190.39]) by tomts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id <20011130203900.ZFIJ9080.tomts7-srv.bellnexxia.net@khan.anarcat.dyndns.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:39:00 -0500 Received: from shall.anarcat.dyndns.org (shall.anarcat.dyndns.org [192.168.0.1]) by khan.anarcat.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B531AAA; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:42:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by shall.anarcat.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9B29720ADB; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:40:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:40:23 -0500 From: The Anarcat To: freebsd-binup@freebsd.org Cc: Brett Glass , Matt Piechota , Jay Keller Subject: Re: OT: package management (was: Re: Updating ssh) Message-ID: <20011130204022.GA581@shall.anarcat.dyndns.org> Reply-To: freebsd-binup@freebsd.org References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011129145159.00afd050@localhost> <20011130151834.Q40720-100000@cithaeron.argolis.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011130151834.Q40720-100000@cithaeron.argolis.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [I should have moved this to -binup some time ago, but here we go.] On Ven nov 30, 2001 at 03:19:24pm -0500, Matt Piechota wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Brett Glass wrote: >=20 > > >And there is a solution: we have a package management suite, we should > > >use it to package the base system. > > > > I really do like this idea. >=20 > I don't know if we'd want to do the entire system this way, but the more > optional stuff would be nice (named, sendmail, etc). On the contrary, I think the whole system should be this way. A few advantages: 1- transparancy: we have a single install procedure for 3rd party and base apps 2- consistency: we can check the consistency of the system using the package's checksums 3- ease of upgrade: binary upgrade become a trivial matter 4- external distribution: seperate binary packages allow us to distribute stuff such as ftpd as seperate distinct packages Any disavantages? a. --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Pour information voir http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjwH7rUACgkQttcWHAnWiGebPACfb/P6Q7u1Egcq/ApiJlVPRabH POcAoKLei8svmOEvqzGgJ8F4PEn0iebL =tfPv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message