From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 10 6:59: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.newresources.com (newresources.com [38.156.90.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BEB437B66C for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 06:58:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from judah ([206.209.126.116]) by smtp.newresources.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.1a) with SMTP id 2000101009083496:2078 ; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:08:34 -0500 From: "Doug Poland" To: Cc: "ListServer FreeBSD Questions" Subject: RE: Routing without ipfw? Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:58:57 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <39E24CC9.3BF9F219@i-clue.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on NRCSMTP/NRC(Release 5.0.1a|August 17, 1999) at 10/10/2000 09:08:35 AM, Serialize by Router on NRCSMTP/NRC(Release 5.0.1a|August 17, 1999) at 10/10/2000 09:08:36 AM, Serialize complete at 10/10/2000 09:08:36 AM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Christopher, Thanks for the response. I was attempting to get a routing box working and I hadn't compiled firewall options in the kernel yet. Since my box wasn't routing I wasn't sure of the relationship between natd and ipfw. Unfortunately, I'm still not routing correctly. Regards, Doug > > > > Doug Poland wrote: > > > > Greetings all, > > > > Can I route ip between interfaces ( ed0 --> ed1 ) without > > ipfw? > > Yes. The simplest solution is to enable routing with /stand/sysinstall > during installation. > > HTH > -Christoph Sold > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message