From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  9 00:23:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C6F8216A4CE; Mon,  9 Feb 2004 00:23:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A6A4D43D39; Mon,  9 Feb 2004 00:23:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (dwmalone@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i198NFbv074029;	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:23:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from dwmalone@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i198NFBr074025;
	Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:23:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwmalone)
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 00:23:15 -0800 (PST)
From: David Malone <dwmalone@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200402090823.i198NFBr074025@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: dwmalone@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/62385: [PATCH] ipfw2: ip_output() returns ENOBUFS instead
	of EACCES
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 08:23:15 -0000

Synopsis: [PATCH] ipfw2: ip_output() returns ENOBUFS instead of EACCES

Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->ipfw
Responsible-Changed-By: dwmalone
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Feb 9 00:20:53 PST 2004
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
Assing to maintainer list. The patch makes packets denied at layer
cause EACCESS rather than ENOBUFS, and looks sensible to me. I can
commit it if no one objects.

	David.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=62385