From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 9 10:11: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from arnold.neland.dk (mail.neland.dk [194.255.12.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065541521B for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 10:10:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.0.14]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA18073; Sun, 9 Jan 2000 19:10:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Message-ID: <009b01bf5acc$d943f140$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> Reply-To: "Leif Neland" From: "Leif Neland" To: "FreeBSD" Cc: "freebsd-current@FreeBSD. ORG" References: Subject: Anonymity, was: load spike strangeness Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 19:10:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG While I do not agree with your idea of need of anonymity, I respect your = need for it. Could you not, instead of using the handle "FreeBSD", which sortof = already is taken :-), just assume a human name? The use of an obviously = not human name makes it uncomfortable to communicate with you. If you would call you John Smith, or Thomas Jefferson if you want, you = could much more easily hide your (hideous?) precence in the lists. = Please?=20 Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message