From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 16:23:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A0716A4CE; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 16:23:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB2243D1D; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 16:23:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from [194.192.25.143] (laptop.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.143]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBOGNPNv021747; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:23:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <41CC425C.7050906@DeepCore.dk> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:22:52 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <20041223221047.GB6049@ip.net.ua> <20041224094127.GA75931@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20041224094127.GA75931@ip.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.4 cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Daniel Eriksson cc: Soren Schmidt Subject: Re: ATA regression X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 16:23:31 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>>Finally, I had time today to track it down to a single >>>commit. So, the following change breaks my Promise >>>SATA150 controller: >> >>I'm running a Promise SATA150 TX4 on a recent 6-CURRENT >>(2004.12.20.16.00.00) machine without any problems. I only have 3 discs= >>hooked up to it though (plus 2 more on the on-board VIA SATA controller= ). >>Also, I had some problems with ACPI and ATA/SATA on this machine after = the >>last big commit (a few weeks ago) so I turned it off. You might want to= try >>that if you haven't already. The machine is head-less, so I haven't tri= ed >>re-enabling ACPI since then. >> > Nope, turning ACPI off doesn't make any difference except for assigning= > a different IRQ: OK, saw this thread a little late, but I committed some updates to this=20 area earlier today, let me know if that changes anything... --=20 -S=F8ren