From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jan 16 11:20:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EB437B478 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:20:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0GJK1u07988; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:20:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201161920.g0GJK1u07988@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Torbjorn Granlund Subject: Re: kern/33951: pthread_cancel is ignored Reply-To: Torbjorn Granlund Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/33951; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Torbjorn Granlund To: Maxim Konovalov Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/33951: pthread_cancel is ignored Date: 16 Jan 2002 20:17:49 +0100 Maxim Konovalov writes: this bug (feature?) has been already discussed in freebsd-current mail list. Could you please take a look at It is is a feature, then one could wonder what semantics PTHREAD_CANCEL_ASYNCHRONOUS has... =20=20 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D511867+515812+/usr/local/ww= w/db/text/2001/freebsd-current/20011202.freebsd-current =20=20 Thanks, I looked for similar bug reports, but didn't check the mailing list archives. As a workaround you should add a cancellation point in your for(;;) cycle. =20=20 Tried that, but it slows down things unacceptably. --=20 Torbj=F6rn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message