From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 23 22:50:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228CB37B401 for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 22:50:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A907443FB1 for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 22:50:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4O5oEUp084331 for ; Fri, 23 May 2003 22:50:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4O5oEWw084330; Fri, 23 May 2003 22:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 22:50:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200305240550.h4O5oEWw084330@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: oremanj@adsl-64-161-78-226.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net Subject: Re: kern/52454: [PATCH] let init change securelevel to -1 for single-user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: oremanj@adsl-64-161-78-226.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 05:50:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/52454; it has been noted by GNATS. From: oremanj@adsl-64-161-78-226.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/52454: [PATCH] let init change securelevel to -1 for single-user mode Date: 24 May 2003 05:46:07 -0000 > This was intentionally removed from FreeBSD. See rev. 1.36 of init.c. Yes, but if you look deeper into the patch, it contains a kernel patch too. Is there a reason even this wouldn't work? Is it against policy or something? -- Josh