From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Jan  2 16:20:48 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id QAA07729 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 2 Jan 1995 16:20:48 -0800
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA07723 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 2 Jan 1995 16:20:47 -0800
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA02180; Mon, 2 Jan 95 16:59:31 MST
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9501022359.AA02180@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: Why does ls report wrong creation date on symlinks?
To: crtb@helix.nih.gov (Chuck Bacon)
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 95 16:59:30 MST
Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <9501011413.AA02072@helix.nih.gov> from "Chuck Bacon" at Jan 1, 95 09:13:44 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> Still, when information is missing, isn't it generally a Bad Thing
> to invent a fictitious quantity to report?

Uh, what non-invented fictitious quantity would you suggest substituting?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.