From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 13:38:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5B616A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:38:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.2.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2AF43D39 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:38:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu) X-Envelope-From: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu X-Envelope-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.96.70]) by mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1GLc7c08525; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:38:08 -0600 Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1GLc85D057020; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:38:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu) Received: (from koziol@localhost) by sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1GLc8hF057019; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:38:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol) From: Quincey Koziol Message-Id: <200402162138.i1GLc8hF057019@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:38:08 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aligning GENERIC with NOTES? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:38:15 -0000 [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Quincey Koziol writes: > > Ah. :-( I understand this reason, but this will be spreading the poorly > > organized format of GENERIC into the better organized format of the NOTES > > files. Not something I think is a good idea and I won't proceed if that's > > the general consensus... > > I don't agree that GENERIC is poorly organized. Well, it's not _badly_ organized, but it appears more poorly organized when compared with the NOTES files (to me at least :-). One way or another, it would make it much easier to build custom kernel configs if they had the _same_ organization. :-) Perhaps mostly pushing the NOTES files in the direction of GENERIC, with some small tweaks to GENERIC to clean it up a bit? Quincey