From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 24 07:37:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4EF37B401 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD6043F3F for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:37:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5OEb5t0086966 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:37:05 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5OEb5aD086965 for standards@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:37:05 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:37:05 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: standards@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030624143705.GB86804@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030624114418.GA58305@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030624124233.GA83552@nagual.pp.ru> <20030624132552.GA33228@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030624132552.GA33228@HAL9000.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: scanf(3) patch for C99-conformant FP parsing X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 14:37:08 -0000 On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 06:25:52 -0700, David Schultz wrote: > That's what I was worried about. I believe that's okay by the > standard as long as isalnum() still accepts *at least* > [a-z][A-Z][0-9] in any locale. Is this a valid assumption or do I > need to test by hand? Yes, *at least* is guaranteed, we have only ASCII-compatible locales and will never have other ones, due to big problems with C own internal charset, etc.