From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 11 19:32:13 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA15333 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 19:32:13 -0700 Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA15327 for ; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 19:32:11 -0700 Received: (from henrich@localhost) by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id WAA05095; Sun, 11 Jun 1995 22:32:53 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Jun 1995 22:32:53 -0400 From: Charles Henrich Message-Id: <199506120232.WAA05095@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: performance... Newsgroups: lists.freebsd.hackers References: <3rg5hv$vc4@msunews.cl.msu.edu> X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #1 (NOV) Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In lists.freebsd.hackers you write: >On Sun, 11 Jun 1995, Amancio Hasty wrote: >> >> text data bss dec hex >> 806912 57344 79536 943792 e66b0 >> 510.885u 56.288s 10:23.50 90.9% 1118+1251k 1826+572io 208pf+0w > The same kernel config that took 23 to 25 minutes in 950412 and an >AMD 486DX4/100 now only takes 13 minutes with 2.0.5R and an Intel >486DX4/100. I didn't think there was that much different between the >April snapshot and 2.0.5, and certainly AMD vs. Intel won't account >for nearly double the speed. Same disk controller and drive in both >cases. However, no complaints here. :) On one of my really horrible systems (486/66 crappy parts) the build time went from ~35 minutes under 0212 to over an hour an 2.0.5-R :(. Ah well. I should go and see if the P75 Compaq is still faster than a P90 micron now :) -Crh -- Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/