From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 24 22:44:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3398916A4CE; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:44:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.cryptography.com (li-22.members.linode.com [64.5.53.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD9343D53; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:44:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.0.34] (adsl-67-127-84-57.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.127.84.57]) by www.cryptography.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7OMiM8U000331; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:44:23 -0700 Message-ID: <412BC4C5.3000708@root.org> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:44:21 -0700 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org References: <200408231628.i7NGSg8G084516@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040824180620.GA56576@dragon.nuxi.com> <412B9629.3080108@root.org> <20040824213627.GA61527@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040824213627.GA61527@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi.c acpi_resource.c acpivar.h X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 22:44:24 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:25:29PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > >>David O'Brien wrote: >> >>>On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 04:28:42PM +0000, Nate Lawson wrote: >>> >>> >>>>njl 2004-08-23 16:28:42 UTC >>>>FreeBSD src repository >>>>Modified files: >>>> sys/dev/acpica acpi.c acpi_resource.c acpivar.h >>>>Log: >>>>Rework sysresource management. Instead of having each sysresource object >>> >>>... >>> >>> >>>>Tested by: Pawel Worach >>>>Tested by: Radek Kozlowski >>> >>> >>>Tested only on i386, right?? >> >>Still waiting for the amd64 laptop donation. ;-) In any case, I've >>just committed a fix. The amd64,ia64 nexus hadn't been caught up with >>i386 and the resource code depends on the new method. > > In the future, may I make a request that you post patches for large > changes before committing them? Now that ACPI is a multi-platform thing > that is very basic to booting, we have to be careful about changes to it. For large commits (i.e. mpsafe patch), I post patches and get testing. For critical bugfixes like this, I get the reporter to test after I test and then commit. With the minimum MFC period, I want to get critical bugfixes into HEAD as soon as they are tested (to start the clock) and plan to be responsive to any subsequent bug reports. -- Nate