From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 14:04:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A4F16A415; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from mail.rulez.sk (DaEmoN.RuLeZ.sK [84.16.32.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC7343D88; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:04:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danger@rulez.sk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C871CC77; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:04:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DANGER (unknown [217.73.23.230]) by mail.rulez.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E611CC74; Mon, 8 May 2006 16:04:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:04:09 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.14) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <635754523.20060508160409@rulez.sk> To: Vasil Dimov In-Reply-To: <200605081400.k48E0hKl062066@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200605081400.k48E0hKl062066@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mail.rulez.sk X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.568 X-Spam-Level: Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:04:42 -0000 Hi Vasil, Monday, May 8, 2006, 4:00:43 PM, you worte: > The following reply was made to PR docs/96639; it has been noted by GNATS. >> Since `rmport' is an alternative way of removing a port, how about the >> following minor rewording of the above paragraph? >> >> Alternatively, you can use the rmport script, >> from ports/Tools/scripts. >> This script has been written by &a.vd;, who is also its current >> maintainer, so please send questions, patches or suggestions about >> rmport to him. > Sounds good. > >> >> Also, is anyone going to commit the changes of this PR? They look like >> a useful addition to the docs. Let's not leave them to rot in Gnats for >> too long :-) > Well, I guess one needs a doc commit bit to do so? > keramida has one ;-) -- Sincerely, Daniel Gerzo