Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:14:48 -0800 (PST) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: hackers@freebsd.org Cc: julian@elischer.org Subject: Netgraph performance Message-ID: <200111292014.fATKEmI70068@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111291012500.5212-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111291012500.5212-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111291012500.5212-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: > Netgraph is a prototyping tool, which has enough performance to be > useful in non-performance-critical applications. (such as all sync > interfaces). It is not designed for gigabit interfaces etc. You are selling Netgraph way too short. I've been using it intensively with gigabit interfaces, and it performs very, very well. For my application (which involves generating and responding to a whole bunch of network traffic) it has yielded a good 4-5 times better performance than any other alternative I've found. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111292014.fATKEmI70068>