Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:54:03 +0200 From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <tz@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net>, Steve Wills <steve@mouf.net>, ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help needed: net/rubygem-grpc Message-ID: <bf97c60e-2076-cf5b-b587-48b978fdf51f@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <c5c542e2-c667-67b8-ec7b-6dd07069aa91@fechner.net> References: <4474b97e-88ec-ead8-bb13-79e5889bf237@FreeBSD.org> <b74007b8-02f7-0b58-7618-cc006074a6e1@mouf.net> <c5c542e2-c667-67b8-ec7b-6dd07069aa91@fechner.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28.06.2017 17:41, Matthias Fechner wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Am 28.06.2017 um 04:14 schrieb Steve Wills: >> I was taking a look at this. It looks like several things are going on. >> As you noticed, it's going to have to use gmake, you can patch the >> extconf.rb for that. But then you run into other issues. It's expecting >> a pkg-config file for openssl, which we don't have for the openssl in >> base (src). I think this is the only thing in base lacking a .pc file. >> We will have to patch the Makefile for that. It would be best not to use >> any of the bundled things and instead use the versions from ports. I >> noticed there's a newer version, 1.4.0, but it has the same issues. Will >> the newer gitlab work with the 1.4.0 version of the grpc gem? > > regarding the comment here: > https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/issues/154#note_33314534 > > I think gitlab should work with version 1.4.0, but I think a test is always a good idea. Thanks for your time Steve! To add something to Matthias comment: there is already a devel/grpc port, which seems to be very similar to the needed rubygem. Maybe this could help us? Greetings, Torsten
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bf97c60e-2076-cf5b-b587-48b978fdf51f>