From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 6 19:22:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E847106566B for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jasone@canonware.com) Received: from canonware.com (10140.x.rootbsd.net [204.109.63.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7B08FC08 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 19:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.25.16.174] (unknown [173.252.71.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by canonware.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CBD028418; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 12:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Jason Evans In-Reply-To: <4F7F4198.2010705@bluezbox.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 12:22:02 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <2FF97057-905D-4F02-9138-75680ABC6202@canonware.com> <4F79F020.9070504@freebsd.org> <3C11DB18-1C43-446E-A0BC-FC15C6126819@canonware.com> <4F7A170E.8020209@bluezbox.com> <4F7B98C0.6090209@bluezbox.com> <20120405205822.GR9275@thebe.jupiter.sigsegv.be> <3F19C7EF-86D8-4165-AAF1-91424A518333@canonware.com> <4F7F4198.2010705@bluezbox.com> To: Oleksandr Tymoshenko X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: Kristof Provost , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TLS on ARM and MIPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jasone@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 19:22:04 -0000 On Apr 6, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote: > On 06/04/2012 12:09 PM, Jason Evans wrote: >> On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Kristof Provost wrote: >>> It appears to be rather broken on ARM, at least in combination with >>> shared libraries. >>>=20 >>> [=85] >>=20 >> Thanks for testing, Kristof. It's good to know that there are = problems on ARM, but now I'm not sure what to do about committing the = updated malloc. I don't have the time or the hardware to make TLS = reliable on ARM. Do I commit the malloc patch and let someone who cares = about ARM fix TLS after the fact? Or do I wait an indefinite amount of = time to let solid TLS support materialize? >=20 > I'm working on this issue. I hope it will be resolved in a matter of > days. Awesome, that's great news. Thank you. Jason=