From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 23 21:41:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D8F7C7 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:41:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org) Received: from redundancy.redundancy.org (redundancy.redundancy.org [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a9c4::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134CC10D8 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:41:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by redundancy.redundancy.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 362E12FC328; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:41:41 -0700 From: David Thiel To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Subject: Re: graphics/shotwell needs a new home Message-ID: <20130423214141.GJ54253@redundancy.redundancy.org> References: <20130403204322.GA20813@redundancy.redundancy.org> <20130420203957.GA2074@elch.exwg.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130420203957.GA2074@elch.exwg.net> X-OpenPGP-Key-fingerprint: 482A 8C46 C844 7E7C 8CBC 2313 96EE BEE5 1F4B CA13 X-OpenPGP-Key-available: http://redundancy.redundancy.org/lx.gpg X-Face: %H~{$1~NOw1y#%mM6{|4:/ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:41:43 -0000 On 04/20, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > Hi, > > ## David Thiel (lx@freebsd.org): > > > A year or two ago, I fixed up shotwell and took maintainership from > > gnome@. Unfortunately, the build broke a month ago or so, and it needs > > some love from someone much more familiar with gnomeisms to make it > > functional. gnome@ has indicated they don't want it back, for which I > > can't necessarily blame them. > > > > Is there some brave soul that might be willing to adopt it? > > Is there a volunteer yet? You're the first! > If not - I massaged it into a "works for me" state. I'm just about to > file some PRs for upgrading shotwell, if nobody else has already adopted > this port, I'll take maintainership. There was a slightly earlier PR (177913) that also was supposed to fix issues as well - it looks like there are a few differences between the two. I'll try to merge those together and make you the maintainer. Thanks! David