From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 24 20:21:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EB816A41C for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:21:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from luzifer.incubus.de (incubus.de [80.237.207.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2EC43D1F for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:21:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Received: from drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (p54AAEA60.dip.t-dialin.net [84.170.234.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luzifer.incubus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4762FFA6; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:21:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.mkbuelow.net [IPv6:::1]) by drjekyll.mkbuelow.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4OKNSHk011852; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:23:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mkb@incubus.de) Message-ID: <42938D40.1050502@incubus.de> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:23:28 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050509) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <3248.172.16.0.199.1116876092.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <20050523211307.GA36552@xor.obsecurity.org> <42924949.1070902@incubus.de> <200505242141.38289.max@love2party.net> <42938C2E.6020301@incubus.de> <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 OpenPGP: id=6FF22C9F; url=http://www.mkbuelow.net/mkbkeys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Max Laier , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mike Jakubik Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:21:38 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > But are any IRQs shared? Hmm... atapci1 is shared with fxp0 on irq 20.. does fxp0 also require the giant lock? mkb.