From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 3 16:13:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9FC16A417 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:13:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A9313C45D for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:13:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2007 11:13:07 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id IAZ41476; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:12:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-203-219.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.203.219]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2007 11:12:58 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17819.54347.161521.164582@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:05:31 -0500 To: In-Reply-To: <20070103153342.KXTZ60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> References: <20070103153342.KXTZ60.dukecmmtao03.coxmail.com@dukecmmtao03> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090201.459BD467.00B0,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2006-05-09 23:27:51, dmn=5.2.125/2006-10-10 Subject: Multiple port versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:13:07 -0000 Vizion writes: > What is the safest way to remove the earlier versions? By not doing so. Different ports use different versions of the same program; this especially true with things like "automake" and "autoconf". (In the latter two instances there's a push on to unify some or all of these ... but that day is not today.) If I _had_ to do this, I would: run "pkgdb -F" for each port { run "pkg_info -R" on each port if and only if no other ports are listed under "required by", delete the port run "pkgdb -F" } Robert Huff