From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul  8 14:52:13 2010
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 5FC4F1065670; Thu,  8 Jul 2010 14:52:13 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 14:52:13 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: bf1783@gmail.com
Message-ID: <20100708145213.GA56245@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201007081251.o68CpcBF050697@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20100708132111.GO31442@droso.net>
	<AANLkTimMCT8CHmiMcqL5hwgPZX0UF9VmTjwJjcCW-8l3@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimMCT8CHmiMcqL5hwgPZX0UF9VmTjwJjcCW-8l3@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org,
	Erwin Lansing <erwin@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org,
	Brendan Fabeny <bf@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzma Makefile ports/archivers/paq
	Makefile ports/archivers/ppmd-7z Makefile
	ports/devel/abi-compliance-checker Makefile
	ports/devel/api-sanity-autotest Makefile ports/devel/distorm
	Makefile ports/devel/libdisasm ...
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:52:13 -0000

On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 01:29:04PM +0000, b. f. wrote:
> On 7/8/10, Erwin Lansing <erwin@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:51:38PM +0000, Brendan Fabeny wrote:
> >>   Log:
> >>   Change my ports to use my FreeBSD.org email address.
> >
> > This is a sweeping commit explicitly not allowed during a slush.  Also,
> > I am not seeing approval by one of your mentors.  Please take more care.
> 
> Sorry, I'll do so.  I forgot to mention in the commit message that
> makc@ gave his approval, and miwi@ did not object to the commit.  And
> my reading of the criteria for sweeping change suggested that this
> would be admissible because it was a "cosmetic change", mostly to leaf
> ports (with the exception of textproc/wv). If I misunderstood what is
> considered to be cosmetic, please let me know.

Sweeping commit is any commit that touches more than a couple of ports,
and it can even be more strict than that (e.g. shlib port update which
potentially can break things).  Also please see RFC 1855 about excessive
quoting in email.

./danfe