From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  7 22:26:59 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA09717
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 22:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA09701
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 22:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA02800; Fri, 7 Jun 1996 23:26:46 -0600
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 1996 23:26:46 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199606080526.XAA02800@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, davidg@Root.COM,
        hackers@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD Hackers)
Subject: Re: The -stable problem: my view 
In-Reply-To: <10422.834211467@time.cdrom.com>
References: <199606080419.WAA02553@rocky.sri.MT.net>
	<10422.834211467@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Do you have any suggestions?  Would creating a new 'stable' tree today
> > be even remotely acceptable?
> 
> You mean as a solution, or are you speaking more generally?

As a solution today, but not necessarily the 'best' solution.  However,
I think everyone agrees we need to get both you and David back to having
fun, and I'm proposing this as *one* way to make it start to happen this
weekend.


Nate