From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 26 08:07:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id IAA09242 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etinc.com (et-gw-fr1.etinc.com [204.141.244.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA09227 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 08:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [204.141.95.138]) by etinc.com (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA04775; Fri, 26 Sep 1997 11:10:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970926110236.00abfa18@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 11:02:37 -0400 To: Luigi Rizzo , kuku@gilberto.physik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (Christoph Kukulies) From: dennis Subject: Re: diskless 100 Mbit - IntelEtherexpress - Q Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 02:43 PM 9/26/97 +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> Would it be possible with the present status of network drivers/netboot >> to build a diskless 100 MBit (Fast Ethernet) setup of workstations? >> >> Would the Intel Etherexpress card be appropriate HW? I see an empty >> socket on the board but it's unclear to me whether this is for an >> EPROM. > >it could be for an eprom but we don't have eprom support for 100 >mbit cards anyways. > >the way I do it now is to use a boot floppy with a kernel on it and the >diskless stuff that Tor Egge wrote and recently (march-april ?) was >committed. > >as an alternative you can boot off a 10mbit/s "ed"-like card and use an >additional card for 100 mbit/s Is this in the 2.2 release? Is there a doc? Dennis