From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Nov 10 13: 1: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A419C37B41A for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 13:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fAAL0xa25420; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 14:01:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fAAL0w766516; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 14:00:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200111102100.fAAL0w766516@harmony.village.org> To: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: Re: Measuring interrupt latency Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Poul-Henning Kamp In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 09 Nov 2001 13:45:18 EST." <200111091845.fA9IjIE19568@whizzo.transsys.com> References: <200111091845.fA9IjIE19568@whizzo.transsys.com> <574.1005324178@critter.freebsd.dk> <200111091703.fA9H3B753981@harmony.village.org> Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 14:00:58 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200111091845.fA9IjIE19568@whizzo.transsys.com> "Louis A. Mamakos" writes: : One a related, timekeeping note: is there any interest in updating or : extending the SO_TIMESTAMP socket option to return higher resolution : timestamps? Currently, it returns a struct timeval. I think that's a great idea. Something compatible with others would be my first choice. My second choice would be phk's 64.64 idea. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message