From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 4 13:50:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA14715 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 13:50:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nanguo.chalmers.com.au (chalmers.com.au [203.1.96.5]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA14692; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 13:50:09 -0800 (PST) Received: (from robert@localhost) by nanguo.chalmers.com.au (8.7.6/8.7.3) id HAA06076; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 07:51:13 +1000 (EST) From: Robert Chalmers Message-Id: <199702042151.HAA06076@nanguo.chalmers.com.au> Subject: annex+sco, no worries, fbsd, yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org (bsd) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 07:51:13 +1000 (EST) Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org (FreeBSD ISP) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Here's an interesting one. If I run SCO 3.2v4.2 + the Annex(V9.2), traffic flows now worries in both directions. No problems with rfc1323 or anything else. Hook up the FreeBSD 2.2 + Annex(V9.2). Immediate problems. Anything that speaks rfc 1323 has problems. (mostly Sun's and other FreeBSD machines it seems) Why is this? Is there a technical reason for this that anyone knows about? bc -- chalmers.com.au: P.O. Box 2003. Mackay. 4740 +61-0412-079025 robert@chalmers.com.au for Whirled Peas http://www.chalmers.com.au Location: The Great Australian Content Site. 21'7" S, 149'14" E.