From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 6 21:49:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D153916A4E2 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:49:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from H43.C18.B96.tor.eicat.ca (H43.C18.B96.tor.eicat.ca [66.96.18.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5412943D49 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (desktop.home.local [172.16.0.200]) by H43.C18.B96.tor.eicat.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E75611422 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 17:48:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44AD856A.3060209@rogers.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 17:49:30 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamToaster-Information: This messages has been scanned by SpamToaster http://www.digitalprogression.ca X-SpamToaster: Found to be clean X-SpamToaster-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.49, required 3.5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST 1.71) X-SpamToaster-From: mikej@rogers.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Changing balance algorithm on existing gmirror X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:49:13 -0000 Hello, I was wondering if it was possible to change the balance algorithm on an existing gmirror setup, without destroying any data/configuration. I am trying to do some benchmarks, to compare which would work best for my needs. Speaking of.. I noticed this strange behavior, while running a concurrent csup session and extracting the ports tar file, where one disk would get 100% usage, but second around 10. Disks ad4 ad6 KB/t 2.12 2.30 tps 322 394 MB/s 0.67 0.89 % busy 98 8 I am using the round-robin algorithm here, in case it matters.