From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Aug 20 15:58:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA14234 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 15:58:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA14228; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 15:58:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) id PAA12442; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 15:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 15:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199808202258.PAA12442@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> To: obrien@NUXI.com CC: jb@cimlogic.com.au, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <19980820155356.A13715@nuxi.com> (obrien@NUXI.com) Subject: Re: ELF transition for ports (Re: rayshade port) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Satoshi: how about trying them on bento and get bento to ELF ASAP. We * have Bento for 3.0 package testing / building. Seems now is the time to * take a look at this. * * If setting OBJFORMAT=aout will still build a.out's we can ship a.out's if * nessicary, and also let us know if this is a possiblity. The worst that * can happen is we move Bento to ELF and have to do a fresh install from * the latest 3.0-SNAPSHOT. I agree, except we can just do it all in a chrooted area. Most packages are built this way anyway. Justin, do you want to set this up? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message