From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 27 02:19:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5CCBA1 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 02:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [69.66.77.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AAB01774 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 02:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1R2JHaS096717; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:19:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s1R2JHCU096716; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:19:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:19:17 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: Joe Nosay Subject: Re: UDP Lite support Message-ID: <20140227021917.GE81440@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 02:19:26 -0000 --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 07:36:29PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote: > The last thread on this was in 2006. Has it ever been reconsidered or is > the likelihood of too many damaged packets the reason for not supporting? > I'm not sure where to put this question. Apologies for the noise. You've provided next to no context. What is the question? What thread are you referring to? If this is the usual UDP then freebsd-net would be vastly more appropriate than -current. -- Brooks --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iKYEARECAGYFAlMOoKVfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY1NUQ1MTlDMjZBNzgyRTcyNTI5OUJGMDVE OEU4QkU5RjIzODFBRDQACgkQXY6L6fI4GtRhGwCfYJHjUBwvHze/MOSwzMJFkh81 +7oAoN73CYAMFL9q4+jSF7FPvAsfjv2K =xajx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --imjhCm/Pyz7Rq5F2--