Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 01:49:09 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch to improve mutex collision performance Message-ID: <20020221014909.A13952@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020221111915.N65817@wantadilla.lemis.com>; from grog@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 11:19:15AM %2B1030 References: <200202181912.g1IJCGK32122@apollo.backplane.com> <20020218114326.A98974@dragon.nuxi.com> <200202181951.g1IJpip33604@apollo.backplane.com> <20020218153807.E96115@locore.ca> <20020221111915.N65817@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I'm fairly sure JHB does not have a patch to address this but, please, >> be my guest and check P4. > > Actually he does. Maybe you should have checked p4 first yourself. Users of Perforce are starting to force the rest of us to learn and use it. That is totally not acceptable for the general FreeBSD population. Those that chose to use it because they feel the tool is useful for THEMSELVES are of course free to use it. HOWEVER, Perforce is NOT the CM system of the FreeBSD project. Thus users of Perforce are expected to share their bits via posting patches, not forcing everyone to pull them out of the Perforce depot. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020221014909.A13952>