From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 19 18:05:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C8216A428 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 18:05:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vladone@spaingsm.com) Received: from mail.spaingsm.com (llwb135.servidoresdns.net [217.76.137.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9309743D48 for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 18:05:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladone@spaingsm.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [88.158.112.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.spaingsm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217A924C5FA for ; Fri, 19 May 2006 19:37:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 21:05:49 +0300 From: vladone X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.80.03) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <55822942.20060519210549@spaingsm.com> To: ipfw@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: question about pipe and queue used in dummynet X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vladone List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:05:52 -0000 Know anybody if dummynet use an queuing discipline when congestion is anticipated, to alert the sender to slow down? Or a little explain about how to work dummynet? -- Best regards, vladone mailto:vladone@spaingsm.com