From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 10:34:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A186CAE2B6A for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@petermann-it.de) Received: from d2ux.org (d2ux.org [5.9.151.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6EB1A52 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@petermann-it.de) Received: from d2ux.org (unknown [10.0.0.4]) by d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A987B282A22; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:34:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at d2ux.org Received: from d2ux.org ([10.0.0.4]) by d2ux.org (d2ux.org [10.0.0.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6VP2RXFmYgEU; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:34:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 10.0.0.5 (unknown [10.0.0.5]) by d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE35282A19; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:34:54 +0200 (CEST) content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" in-reply-to: <20160330102128.GX35640@home.opsec.eu> from: "Matthias Petermann" X-Forward: 127.0.0.1 date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:34:53 +0200 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org to: "Kurt Jaeger" MIME-Version: 1.0 message-id: <58b-56fbac00-6d-6b8b4580@81991508> subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A?= Add USB product id for i-tec USB =?utf-8?q?2=2E0?= Docking Station User-Agent: SOGoMail 2.3.8 content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:34:56 -0000 Hi, Am Mittwoch, 30. M=C3=A4rz 2016 12:21 CEST, Kurt Jaeger schrieb: > Hi! > > > > in mid 2015 I did submit a patch[1] to add an USB product ID to > > > improve the out-of-the-box experience for owners of i-tec USB 2.0= > > > Docking Stations. As there is no state change on the report since= > > > then, I am wondering if I did address this the wrong way. > > > > You did everything OK. > > hselasky committed the fix to HEAD (thanks!) > > There's one thing you could have done earlier in the release cycle > for 10.3: Nudge on -current or -stable about the PR so that > it can still be put into 10.3. I think it will be too late for 10.3 n= ow 8-( Thanks, I will followup earlier next time. Anyway - at the time I did t= he patch the udl driver was not existing in 10.x series. Best regards, Matthias