From nobody Sat Mar 16 09:10:29 2024 X-Original-To: ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Txb1p6z1Hz5CtcW for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:10:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from edna.lautre.net (edna.lautre.net [80.67.160.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "lautre.net", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Txb1n4KR3z4XKn for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=freebsd.org (policy=none); spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of thierry@pompo.net designates 80.67.160.88 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=thierry@pompo.net Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [82.66.0.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by edna.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFDB310EBAF for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:10:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 66DF2287D7C; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:10:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 10:10:29 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: ports@freebsd.org References: <7a7501f71442d27f6d8c1c0a16f247c1@mail.infomaniak.com> <7fd610fa25ffb9a4348aaadf7459a689@mail.infomaniak.com> <20240315072753.46ffa39e1bbb2e0996099cdf@dec.sakura.ne.jp> <2cfb2038d956813eefb068a8f61e1970@mail.infomaniak.com> <2a868d2a-649e-4b76-870d-2cd8cfeb4f7d@app.fastmail.com> <514c12bf-0605-4d83-96e6-132507ce470d@quip.cz> List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FaRrXgu3Vjpfs2UG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <514c12bf-0605-4d83-96e6-132507ce470d@quip.cz> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 14.0-STABLE amd64 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc;y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.tKjAnXLs: X-PGP: 0xF1C516B3C8359753 X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.06 / 15.00]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.951]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.89)[0.887]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[thierry@freebsd.org,thierry@pompo.net]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[freebsd.org : SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM,none]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[thierry@freebsd.org,thierry@pompo.net]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20766, ipnet:80.67.160.0/19, country:FR]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[thierry]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Txb1n4KR3z4XKn --FaRrXgu3Vjpfs2UG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le sam. 16 mars 24 =C3=A0 9:28:23 +0100, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.c= z> =C3=A9crivait=C2=A0: > If you are asking to remove ports without maintainer, you are asking to > remove 3458 ports right now, and many others depends on these unmaintained > ports, so the impact will be much bigger. Seconded! Ports without an identified maintainer are not "unmaintained". E.g. the ports net/mpich and net/openmpi* are maintained by ports@freebsd.org and I regularly maintain them: of course I could claim their maintainership, by I don=E2=80=99t, because these are quiet complex p= orts, and if other people need to modify them when I=E2=80=99m not available to r= eview their changes, I don=E2=80=99t want to block them. --=20 Th. Thomas. --FaRrXgu3Vjpfs2UG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJl9WIFXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFNTM2QkU4NTM4NTM5OUQwMEI2RkFBNzZG MUM1MTZCM0M4MzU5NzUzAAoJEPHFFrPINZdT9ZAP/jmHAFE+ylaZ3c3q7f/vlLsl avZMCgcfp0b6lqk4SZW/nGOHxAFPqidaLPWabUeaMQzP12dBOa+oLfDfufM1FjxJ CPMYbBVXvm80pZdKJyOtlkmHjwU8qAaW5wFCxY8YEoXaKDdTS41UwdGCR8f0CuDp 8tyqIra/g+nPOZgLvEPfQyBTJsjWLuozv9S8ueIv6JxjZ66st6ALsI8eAKNBfrr+ ZSadwIdpJuXT/z9TScuFWeuOiyHLVf81k3bdPkp3wAwkhoAup+6xHx8DcJBrLh4u SfsR8RirsbDHt85iirVbezohjh/aKRWIL4ttbogsUQioKML0EdzCFdz91GQjKE3V DwrhkIqFlyKWYui27i47PgnuPUnseTRrk7PuNEtjfpQGXDpfoM8H95sygX2a18QL LXyNf381ew4RHX5JewcUWbRsgiKd9MCv33g/x08g3wzeJGOmwDv3BfXA2j9SI9ic HD2SnasTxA1znWs6JpHPa5SNdzYUHae/97+OI0tYgwxT29uRF6pvOKvoX7vSiha/ qJLMiFIQXFmQD3rL9/7icE3KupNXURMoW4jNU7S2rH0qeLO0x96jbCZe5zK0F6vm uR1XYbI5kbdv7l9lZE20fUfn6X26lq8fEJiGAUPHFOxxiT5Gwl+bfT73WtmNKHVw 8WItkphBzTHc734M9l3y =V9Ou -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FaRrXgu3Vjpfs2UG--