From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 8 09:08:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6A0106564A for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:08:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe15.swip.net [212.247.155.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C028FC08 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:08:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=VWuzlhLQqxAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=M8b_wTzEtboA:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:17 a=o0zQbiD9AAAA:8 a=0m7h8hzpAAAA:8 a=lNieZC5AVUH5js7iDtwA:9 a=Gb1nk_8o6g-gcYINcyWhzY-yfi4A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=13CKhUYk-dQA:10 a=Fb4p3Z96-coA:10 Received: from [188.126.201.140] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe15.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 637026488; Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:08:49 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:07:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-STABLE; KDE/4.3.4; amd64; ; ) References: <20100308021642.GQ11192@cicely7.cicely.de> <201003080300.o28303CD011298@casselton.net> In-Reply-To: X-Face: +~\`s("[*|O,="7?X@L.elg*F"OA\I/3%^p8g?ab%RN'( =?iso-8859-1?q?=3B=5FIjlA=3A=0A=09hGE=2E=2EEw?=, =?iso-8859-1?q?XAQ*o=23=5C/M=7ESC=3DS1-f9=7BEzRfT=27=7CHhll5Q=5Dha5Bt-s=7Co?= =?iso-8859-1?q?TlKMusi=3A1e=5BwJl=7Dkd=7DGR=0A=09Z0adGx-x=5F0zGbZj=27e?=(Y[(UNle~)8CQWXW@:DX+9)_YlB[tIccCPN$7/L' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201003081007.14326.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Mark Tinguely , ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: Performance of SheevaPlug on 8-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:08:52 -0000 On Monday 08 March 2010 09:25:59 Jacques Fourie wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > > > > >> It is still puzzling me why it is not near 80 seconds. > >> This would mean it is loosing something about 5-6 cycles. > >> Well - Ok - the pipeline might be that long and real loops are > >> mostly some instructions longer. > >> But I would still be interested to see Linux results on RM9200. > >> > >> -- > >> B.Walter http://www.bwct.de > >> Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm. > > > > Thinking way out of the box ... has anyone tried this in single user > > mode? > > Was the output from "vmstat -i" and "top" posted? --HPS