Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:07:14 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Cc: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net>, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: Performance of SheevaPlug on 8-stable Message-ID: <201003081007.14326.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <be2f52431003080025s3d95560dg359501a3ba256048@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100308021642.GQ11192@cicely7.cicely.de> <201003080300.o28303CD011298@casselton.net> <be2f52431003080025s3d95560dg359501a3ba256048@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 08 March 2010 09:25:59 Jacques Fourie wrote: > On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net> wrote: > > <deletes> > > > >> It is still puzzling me why it is not near 80 seconds. > >> This would mean it is loosing something about 5-6 cycles. > >> Well - Ok - the pipeline might be that long and real loops are > >> mostly some instructions longer. > >> But I would still be interested to see Linux results on RM9200. > >> > >> -- > >> B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de > >> Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm. > > > > Thinking way out of the box ... has anyone tried this in single user > > mode? > > Was the output from "vmstat -i" and "top" posted? --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201003081007.14326.hselasky>