From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 9 13:51:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA17048 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 13:51:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA16963; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 13:50:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id TAA14137; Fri, 9 Oct 1998 19:49:22 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199810091849.TAA14137@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: ipfw broken? ... To: skafte@worldgate.com (Greg Skafte) Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 19:49:22 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <19981009142742.A22107@worldgate.com> from "Greg Skafte" at Oct 9, 98 02:27:23 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I've got a 2.2.7-stable machince acting as a router. > > I'm using ipfw to count traffic + do antispoofing on each interface. > > it seems that ipfw count seems confused, ie ipfw -a l shows > 02000 0 0 count ip from any to any via de2 did it work before the dummynet integration ? do you have other rules before which could match ? luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message