Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 21:12:28 +0100 From: "Schmidts" <elixr@corpdial.co.za> To: "Andy Fawcett" <andy@athame.co.uk>, <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Cc: eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com Subject: Re:Please remove my email address from your mailing list Message-ID: <056e01c49cf4$54dbf0f0$0554ef9b@SCHMIDT> References: <54410EF4-FCB3-11D8-B720-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com><200409021053.08334.andy@athame.co.uk><20040902210032.13dbe3c9.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <200409022244.38931.andy@athame.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi
Please would you remove my email address from your mailing list
Thank you
Bernadette
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Fawcett" <andy@athame.co.uk>
To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Cc: <mka_fuhrmann@arcor.de>; <mb@imp.ch>; <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>;
<openoffice@freebsd.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 Beta2 - OO does not compile
> On Thursday 02 September 2004 22:00, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> > Andy Fawcett wrote:
> > > I have 5.3-BETA2, built without libc_r to ensure I don't get
> > > threading library conflicts (NOLIBC_R defined). I've made sure that
> > > the libc_r.* files are not present on the system.
> > >
> > > When building OOo-1.1, the first failure is in gcc32 in the
> > > gcc-java stuff. It tries to link against libc_r, and I needed to
> > > define WITHOUT_LIBJAVA=yes to avoid this.
> >
> > I've no problem with compiling openoffice @5.3-BETA2... my make.conf
> > says..
> >
> > [...]
> > .elif ${_MY_PORTNAME} == "openoffice-1.1"
> > WITHOUT_MOZILLA= yo
> > WITHOUT_JAVA= yo
> > #WITH_CCACHE= yo
> > .elif ${_MY_PORTNAME} == "popt"
> > [...]
> >
> > So maybe try defining WITHOUT_MOZILLA and WITHOUT_JAVA - but it
> > should work w/o defining them- at least with java. And mozilla of
> > course by overriding the vuln. warnings...
>
> Thanks, I'd pretty much got to this point myself, but it's good to hear
> confirmation it works for someone else too.
>
> However, I do find it a bit strange that one of the premier applications
> has not been made safe wrt threading libs, especially after the major
> efforts made over the last year to get the ports tree into shape ready
> for libc_r NOT being the default lib.
>
> Maybe there's time before the freeze tomorrow to change these flags to
> be the CORRECT default values for 5.3-RELEASE? (similarly for gcc32,
> which is required for building OOo).
>
> Cheers,
>
> A.
> --
> Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk
> | tap@kde.org
> "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org
> we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?056e01c49cf4$54dbf0f0$0554ef9b>