Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 20:25:39 +0100 From: Tom Hukins <tom@eborcom.com> To: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net> Cc: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple Apache ports Message-ID: <19990610202539.A407@eborcom.com> In-Reply-To: <004201beb2f0$887ad8c0$8dfee0d1@westbend.net>; from Scot W. Hetzel on Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 10:22:56PM -0500 References: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990609110116.6269E-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com> <375F16B9.CF04D2C1@partitur.se> <004201beb2f0$887ad8c0$8dfee0d1@westbend.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 10:22:56PM -0500, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > You may want to check out the NetBSD package tree (ports to us FreeBSD > folks). They have already solved the apache DSO problem for most of the > main apache modules (ap-auth-cookies, ap-fastcgi, ap-perl, ap-php3, ap-ssl). As someone who follows the mod_perl mailing list, I'd be wary of using DSO for mod_perl. People are often having problems with DSO and mod_perl. DSO is fairly new, so this isn't really surprising. DSO is great from a port maintainer's perspective, but from my observations of others' experience I get the impression it's less stable than non-DSO Apache. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990610202539.A407>