From owner-freebsd-chat Tue Feb 15 18:18:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com (cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com [24.2.89.207]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130296177 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:09:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cjc@localhost) by cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA46000; Tue, 15 Feb 2000 21:09:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 21:09:35 -0500 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Juergen Nickelsen Cc: Kris Kirby , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Windows 2000 isn't that smart, but everything else is Message-ID: <20000215210935.C45552@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> Reply-To: cjclark@home.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from jnickelsen@acm.org on Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 09:42:11AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Juergen Nickelsen wrote: > Kris Kirby writes: > > > > arp: 10.1.1.15 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:40:05:4d:11:af on ed0 > > > arp: 10.1.1.15 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:40:05:4d:11:af on ed0 > > > arp: 10.1.1.15 is on fxp0 but got reply from 00:40:05:4d:11:af on ed0 > > > > This is supposedly "Retail" Win2K, but it has no idea where to send ARPs. > > Lucky for it that the gateway machine is connected across both LANs. :-) > > I saw this a lot from a FreeBSD box (3.4-RELEASE) that was connected > to the same Ethernet segment with two NICs (in different logical > networks). It really got on my nerves, and Windows 2000 was not > involved. Shouldn't put two NICs from one host on one physical LAN. Hurts network performance. I have yet to hear a good reason to do it. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message