From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jul 26 06:09:55 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA29668
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 06:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns.cs.msu.su (root@redsun.cs.msu.su [158.250.10.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA29662
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 06:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from janus.msu.su (janus [158.250.17.20]) by ns.cs.msu.su (8.8.6/8.6.12) with SMTP id RAA16671; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 17:10:06 +0400 (DST)
Received: by janus.msu.su (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id RAA05708; Sat, 26 Jul 1997 17:10:03 +0400
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 17:10:03 +0400
From: laskavy@cs.msu.su (Sergei S. Laskavy)
Message-Id: <199707261310.RAA05708@janus.msu.su>
To: gibbs@plutotech.com
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: /bin/chio: why in /bin ? [/usr/bin/mt]
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

L> I wonder why "mt", "tar" are in "/usr/bin" while chio is in "/bin".

G> Because you may need it in order to do a restore.

But... I think, usually on one tape there are many dumps.
Why "mt" is not in "/bin" then?

Sergei S. Laskavy