Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:04:22 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Arch <arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Request for review: build infrastructure for Clang Message-ID: <201005190904.22248.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100519071630.GA77151@freebsd.org> References: <20100514152408.GN56080@hoeg.nl> <4BF30230.8020001@FreeBSD.org> <20100519071630.GA77151@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 3:16:30 am Roman Divacky wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 02:10:08PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > On 5/18/2010 12:35 AM, Roman Divacky wrote: > > > two now (clang and tblgen) with one more coming soon (llvm-mc/as) > > > > With just two binaries I'd suggest usr.bin/clang and usr.bin/tblgen. > > the tblgen is used only for building clang/llvm stuff so I don't > think it deserves it's own directory. maybe we should not even > install in during installworld Given that we nest for gcc, I think it is fine to nest for clang. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201005190904.22248.jhb>