From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 18 13:34:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from relay.gnf.org (relay.gnf.org [208.44.31.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7E637B408; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gnf.org (smtp.gnf.org [10.0.0.11]) by relay.gnf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9IKYns31671; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:34:49 -0700 Received: by mail.gnf.org (Postfix, from userid 888) id 94D3111E508; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gnf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EA311A572; Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:31:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Gordon Tetlow To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: , Subject: Re: New rc.d init script roadmap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 18 Oct 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Gordon Tetlow writes: > > M1 (Patch included) > > Setup infrastructure > > Make rcorder compile > > Your rcorder patch is incorrect. FreeBSD lacks a prototype for > fparseln(). It so happens that it doesn't make any difference on any > of the platforms FreeBSD supports (because our ints and pointers are > the same size), but that's no reason not to do things right. I was wondering about that warning myself, but it seemed to work and I don't try to pretend to be a master of C. I'll stick to the shell world in general. > Also, I don't see the point in munging the Makefile like you do - I > think we can live with having a Makefile that's slightly (and > trivially) different from NetBSD's. Fair enough, everyone seemed to be touting the flag of portability so I just added it into the mix as well. -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message