From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul 16 10:29:23 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2705C1065675
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:29:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24CF8FC1C
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:29:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1377314DC162;
	Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:29:20 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu
Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1])
	by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id Y6Mlr01G84uD; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.105] (catv-80-99-92-167.catv.broadband.hu
	[80.99.92.167])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8FDF14DC159;
	Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4C403476.4020704@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:29:10 +0200
From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-PT;
	rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>
References: <4C39D92F.4050605@FreeBSD.org>	<4C39DB09.6010808@andric.com>	<4C39DBFF.2000307@FreeBSD.org>	<AANLkTilqEfe_EL_3ExodMgqfmU-DubIdlRs-5NXXT4dO@mail.gmail.com>	<4C3AF87B.3030707@FreeBSD.org>	<AANLkTinwsNqH19LF7CAc6uC2NZuh2CdCkfEtsv6yM2Bt@mail.gmail.com>	<4C3F80D3.8080809@FreeBSD.org>
	<AANLkTikX8kYatUT2pwbUbkd2HY9ISFlIJx5bVgJ7Os2D@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikX8kYatUT2pwbUbkd2HY9ISFlIJx5bVgJ7Os2D@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: strange problem with int64_t variables
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:29:23 -0000

Em 2010.07.16. 12:17, pluknet escreveu:
> Almost the same (#__jid_t#jid_t#).
>
>    
Did you have to include any header for that? IIRC, I used __jid_t 
because it didn't compile with jid_t.
> The difference (and probably a trigger of bug elsewhere) might be in
> that this lives
> on amd64 arch (while yours on i386 afair). Just a food for thoughts.
>    
Yes, and now I also added the entries to 
sys/compat/freebsd32/syscalls.master, although I think it's just for 
32-bit binaries on 64-bit systems but let's see if that helps.

Thanks for your help.

Gabor